Get Email Updates from NBT
NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ—Rutgers finally released a long-awaited report detailing the chaos that unfolded in New Brunswick and Piscataway during Hurricane Sandy, but the report is missing more than 100 pages.
Dated March 28, the document speaks to “significant confusion for some about the chain of command during the emergency” and details major miscommunications and lack of communication between Rutgers and the City of New Brunswick.
“The mixed message of road closures in New Brunswick combined with Rutgers’ expectation for staff to report to work further complicated the situation,” reads one page of the extensive document.
“In some cases, unilateral unit-based decisions were announced or made independently without appropriate vetting or consideration; in hindsight, some of these decisions should have been overturned and selected personnel should have been required to provide their needed services,” reads another.
The report also confirmed that New Brunswick’s water system was at least partly responsible for the evacuation of more than 6,000 dorm students for the better part of a week.
” Because of electrical issues and water pump failures in the city of New Brunswick, the College Avenue and Cook/Douglass Campuses needed to be relocated to Busch and Livingston,” states the report.
“But there was not enough room in the residence halls on those campuses, which resulted in the use of the student centers as shelter space for residents; some stayed in those spaces for several nights.”
New Brunswick officials never accepted the fact that Rutgers had evacuated every dorm in the city because the city’s water system was struggling without power during the massive storm.
A spokesman for Mayor James Cahill had previously said that the water system, which is in the midst of its own scandal, had nothing to do with the evacuation.
The spokesman, Russell Marchetta, inexplicably denied the connection at the November 7, 2012 City Council meeting.
“The only reason they evacuated was for fire alarm systems that weren’t fully functional at the time. It had nothing to do with our water supply,” Marchetta said.
Still, the entirety of the eight-month-old report has still not been made public, due to supposed security concerns.
“Pages 63 to 168 (Appendix E through P) constitute the sub-committee reports. These pages have been redacted in their entirety because they are advisory, consultative and deliberative and are exempt from OPRA,” reads an addition to the original report.
Despite taking several months to release the document to the public, the work that Rutgers attorneys did redacting the report is clearly minimal.
Aside from the 106 consecutive pages removed, only a handful of words were redacted on two different pages. Attorneys must have spent the rest of their time using a rudimentary image editing program like Microsoft Paint cross out names of individuals in screenshots taken from Facebook.
While one page in the document show efforts to obscure both the names and profile photographs of commenters on the university’s Facebook page, no effort was made to redact such photos on page 87 of the report.
It took the university more than nine weeks to release the report after University President Bob Barchi first publicly discussed it on September 27. The university requested five separate extensions under the Open Public Records Act to keep from releasing the full report.
Charlie is the founder and editor of New Brunswick Today, and the winner of the Awbrey Award for Community-Oriented Local Journalism. He is a proud Rutgers University journalism graduate, a community organizer, and a former independent candidate for mayor of New Brunswick.